Una Sedleniece, Culture Theorist
Published in visual arts magazine Studija issue No. 72 (June/July 2010).
Translator into English: Filips Birzulis
As regards Stone Age art museums, there is an absence of incontrovertible facts. There is, however, evidence that artists were working at that time. One of the first artists working in the territory of Latvia was a resident of the Madona region – the unknown creator of the Lubāna Apollo.
Near Lubāna, at an encampment on the Abora Rover, archaeologists have found a late Neolithic bone figure, thus far the only one of its kind to be found in Latvia. It terms of popularity it cannot compete with another example of the genre, the spatially and temporally distant Venus of Willendorf in Austria.(1) However, in 2008 our Apollo almost became a media star: it was included in the top thirty list of the visual arts section in the Cultural Canon of Latvia, as an artwork which has been an inspiration in the field of visual culture within the territory of Latvia from ancient times to the end of the 20th century.(2)
There are a couple of dozen museums in Latvia that each have some combination involving the word ‘art’ in their names: ‘history and art’, ‘regional studies and art’ or simply ‘art’ museums. However, even more than their names, museums differ from one another in their carefully crafted mission statements, seeking to answer the question: why is the museum necessary?